Public submissions, oral evidence, and select committee documents from NZ Parliament on Road User Charges legislation. Includes individual and organisational submissions on the Light Electric RUC Vehicles Amendment Bill and related transport inquiries.
1355 resources
Parliamentary document from Ministry of Transport (4 Dec 2025): supports the RUC legislation or proposals. Key concerns and topics discussed include revenue and funding, environmental concerns, implementation challenges.
This submission from Private Bag 6995 supports Road User Charges legislation, focusing on Road User Charges and electric vehicles. The submission examining implementation challenges, offering perspective on policy impacts and implementation. Key arguments address stakeholder concerns and propose specific legislative recommendations.
This submission from Vehicle Standard) Amendment Bill has nuanced views on Road User Charges legislation, focusing on electric vehicles and climate. The submission emphasizing climate considerations, offering perspective on policy impacts and implementation. Key arguments address stakeholder concerns and propose specific legislative recommendations.
This submission from Submitting Organization, dated 16 Oct 2025, proposes reforms to RUC legislation. Key themes include compliance and administration. The document provides specific recommendations for policy improvements or changes.
______________________________________________ opposes the Road User Charges (Light Electric Vehicles) Amendment Bill. Key areas: pricing and environmental impact.
Public Submission (30 Sep 2025). Addresses Road User Charges (RUC) legislation. Position: neutral.
This briefing note from Departmental Report to the Transport and Infrastructure, dated 27 Aug 2025, raises significant concerns about RUC legislation. Key themes include cost and pricing impacts, heavy vehicle industry, revenue and funding. The document provides specific recommendations for policy improvements or changes.
This submission from Unknown addresses the Road User Charges (Light Electric Vehicles) Amendment Bill. The submitter acknowledges the necessity of the change while identifying important considerations and accommodations that should be addressed. Key arguments center on: Kia ora koutou Thank you for the opportunity to speak to the EROAD submission on the Time of use charging Bill The submission addresses policy considerations related to RUC implementation for electric vehicles in New Zealand.
This transcript records oral evidence presented before the Transport and Infrastructure Select Committee on 22 May 2025 regarding the Road User Charges Amendment Bill. The evidence addresses electric vehicle exemption, implementation timeline. The testimony provides stakeholder perspectives, practical insights, and responses to committee members' questions on implementing the proposed RUC policy changes.
This submission was made by Darren Davidson on 22 May 2025 regarding Road User Charges (RUC) legislation. The submitter opposes the proposed RUC measures, citing concerns about the policy approach. Key concerns include: financial burden or affordability, environmental considerations, alternative approaches, implementation concerns, exemptions or transition provisions. The submission argues: "What stands out with this bill is it lacks clear implementation details..." The document provides detailed input on RUC policy implementation.
This is a public submission (22 May 2025) to the New Zealand Parliament regarding the Road User Charges (Light Electric Vehicles) Amendment Bill. Lucinda Jarvis is generally supportive of the proposed RUC legislation for light electric vehicles. The submission focuses on fairness concerns, electric vehicle treatment, fuel-type differentiation, revenue collection mechanisms, highlighting concerns about how the RUC system applies across different vehicle types and fuel sources.
This submission from Logan Campbell addresses the Road User Charges (Light Electric Vehicles) Amendment Bill. The submitter presents perspectives on the amendment. Key arguments center on: No more road tolls Recommendations Increase RUC or levies for EV cars and trucks as they do more damage to roads when they catch fire Page 1 of 1 28/04/2025 file:///C:/Windows/T... The submitter recommends: Increase RUC or levies for EV cars and trucks as they do more damage to roads when they catch fire.
Public Submission from Colleen Kitto (22 May 2025). Addresses: Land Transport Management (Time of Use. Position: neutral. Key argument: Time of use charging as a modification for behavior is abhorrent. By imposing financial charges for use of roads for different vehicles you are tripple dipping the tax payer.. Recommends: Conduct an internal audit by a forensic accountant to see where the money is going/wasted. Use savings to design better roading systems..
EROAD supports the Road User Charges (Light Electric Vehicles) Amendment Bill. Key areas: pricing and environmental impact.
Sacha Blomer opposes the Road User Charges (Light Electric Vehicles) Amendment Bill. The current system of imposing RUC based on kms travelled is fair, reasonable, and equitable-. Key areas: pricing and fairness.
This submission from I oppose this bill. opposes Road User Charges legislation, focusing on Road User Charges and fuel taxation. The submission proposing alternative approaches, offering perspective on policy impacts and implementation. Key arguments address stakeholder concerns and propose specific legislative recommendations.
This submission from Kia Ora Tatau, opposes Road User Charges legislation, focusing on Road User Charges and electric vehicles. The submission providing policy analysis, offering perspective on policy impacts and implementation. Key arguments address stakeholder concerns and propose specific legislative recommendations.
This submission from New Zealand Transport Agency addresses road user charges, congestion pricing, and transport funding mechanisms in New Zealand. The submission includes specific recommendations for policy implementation and legislative design. It contributes to parliamentary inquiry deliberations on managing congestion and funding transport infrastructure in New Zealand.
This is a Analysis from Unknown (27 Mar 2025). Supports RUC legislation. Key point: The Petitions Committee recommend to The Parliament that RUC for light EVs is set to $35 per The submission/document indicates: The Petitions Committee recommend to The Parliament that RUC for light EVs is set to $35 per The document addresses aspects of Road User Charges policy and its implementation.
Ministry of Transport Te Manatū Waka opposes the Road User Charges (Light Electric Vehicles) Amendment Bill. Key areas: pricing and environmental impact.
Showing 1-20 of 1355 resources
